[GAP Forum] bug in LLLReducedGramMat? II
Bill Allombert
Bill.Allombert at math.u-bordeaux.fr
Fri Oct 30 22:23:40 GMT 2015
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:11:15PM +0100, Benjamin Sambale wrote:
> Meanwhile, I figured that M in my last email is not positive
> semidefinite, and so it is not a Gram matrix as required in the
> manual. But since many other non-semidefinite matrices do work, one
> should at least change the error message.
I am curious, how do you define 'work' ?
Cheers,
Bill.
More information about the Forum
mailing list