> < ^ Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1993 13:29:58 +0200
> < ^ From: Dmitrii Pasechnik <d.pasechnik@twi.tudelft.nl >
< ^ Subject: Re: Re: stack overflow
Dima Pasechnik writes in his e-mail message of 1993/08/24

Let me suggest the memory control to be implemented in future versions,
to avoid those problems. I'd guess it wouldn't affect the speed.

I never tried it, but I think that it would indeed affect the
performance. It would mean (at least) one more increment/decrement and
test of a global variable in 'EvFuncCall', and this function is already a
series bottleneck for many computations.

I'd give it less than 0.1% of the speed anyway. Indeed, each memory allocation
in the interpreted languages (say, Basic, or GAP) takes hundreds of commands.

Martin.

-- .- .-. - .. -.  .-.. --- ...- . ...  .- -. -. .. -.- .-
Martin Sch"onert,   Martin.Schoenert@Math.RWTH-Aachen.DE,   +49 241 804551
Lehrstuhl D f"ur Mathematik, Templergraben 64, RWTH, 52056 Aachen, Germany

--
Dima Pasechnik,
Dept. of Mathematics,
Univ. of Western Australia, Nedlands WA 6009, Australia
e-mail:dima@maths.uwa.edu.au


> < [top]